Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #8393 PPC: Fix validation error on PolyBenchC

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2024 at 12:30):

feilongjiang requested elliottt for a review on PR #8393.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2024 at 12:30):

feilongjiang opened PR #8393 from feilongjiang:fix_pcc to bytecodealliance:main:

Hi team, please consider.
As described in #8380, when running PCC validation on workloads like PolyBenchC, it will report an UnsupportedFact error.
Based on the analysis of trace logs, I think attach_constant_fact introduced by #8173 should also consider the type of constant when adding facts for iconsts. After #8173, we may generate the following facts for i32 constants:

block9:
  v4339 ! range(64, 0xea28, 0xea28) = iconst.i32 0xea28
  v2858 ! range(64, 0x8, 0x8) = iconst.i32 8
  v4406 ! range(64, 0x115a0, 0x115a0) = iconst.i32 0x0001_15a0
  v4407 ! range(64, 0x115a8, 0x115a8) = iadd v4406, v2858  ; v4406 = 0x0001_15a0, v2858 = 8

These i32 constants have their bit_width set to 64, causing the error.

#8173 also exposes another issue on AArch64 when generating facts for MovK, we should calculate the running value for MovK with the field mask.

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

• If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
  conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".

• Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
  this can be brief.

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2024 at 12:30):

feilongjiang requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #8393.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 17 2024 at 12:48):

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8393:

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @cfallin, @fitzgen

<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:area:aarch64", "isle"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

• cfallin: isle
• fitzgen: isle

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.
</details>

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 06:56):

jameysharp submitted PR review:

Thank you! This looks good to me, though I'd like @cfallin to take a look before merging it, and he may not be able to get to it until next week.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 06:56):

jameysharp submitted PR review:

Thank you! This looks good to me, though I'd like @cfallin to take a look before merging it, and he may not be able to get to it until next week.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 06:56):

jameysharp created PR review comment:

I'd prefer parentheses here even if they're not strictly required:

                let constant = (input_constant & !mask) | constant;

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 13:47):

feilongjiang updated PR #8393.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 13:51):

feilongjiang commented on PR #8393:

@jameysharp Thanks for the review!

and he may not be able to get to it until next week.

That’s okay, we can wait until @cfallin comes back!

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 13:54):

feilongjiang updated PR #8393.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 19:12):

cfallin submitted PR review:

LGTM, thanks!

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2024 at 19:50):

cfallin merged PR #8393.

Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC