alexcrichton opened PR #8228 from alexcrichton:doc-wasi
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Currently the
wasmtime-wasi
crate is pretty sparse on documentation and additionally had some papercuts in the API. I've attempted to document all the major bits with words and examples here in addition to performing some quality-of-life refactors for API usage in the future. I'd like to refactor the WASIp2 bits a bit more to make them a bit more similar to the WASIp1 bits too, but that's a larger refactoring for a future PR.Closes https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/8187 (they're now at the same level)
Closes https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/8188 (I've synchronized interfaces added)I'll note that
wasmtime-wasi-http
could still use some love as well, which I haven't touched in this PR.
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #8228.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #8228.
rylev submitted PR review.
rylev submitted PR review.
rylev created PR review comment:
Not related to this PR exactly, but one pattern that can be very useful when a builder is required to build a type is to a
builder
function to that type. So in this case:WasiCtx::builder();
rylev created PR review comment:
This always bothered me that this is called
perms
instead ofdir_perms
to contrast withfile_perms
. What do we think about renaming that arg?
rylev created PR review comment:
Should
guest_path
be second so that file paths are first and permissions second?
alexcrichton updated PR #8228.
alexcrichton commented on PR #8228:
All good suggestions :+1:
fitzgen requested sunfishcode for a review on PR #8228.
fitzgen commented on PR #8228:
Redirecting review to @sunfishcode since I haven't ever really touched this crate.
alexcrichton commented on PR #8228:
I'll also tag @elliottt since he's worked on these crates as well
alexcrichton requested elliottt for a review on PR #8228.
rylev submitted PR review.
rylev created PR review comment:
I'm confused by this. Why does the
preopened_dir
only take two arguments?
rylev submitted PR review.
rylev created PR review comment:
/// asynchronous version see [`bindings::Command`](super::Command).
rylev created PR review comment:
I'm unsure about
sync
vs.async_io
. It seems like the previoussync_io
contrasts more clearly withasync_io
sunfishcode submitted PR review.
sunfishcode submitted PR review.
sunfishcode created PR review comment:
This might be out of scope for this PR but: is there a reason we need to add all the interfaces manually here? The
world
in the Wit level groups all these interfaces together, so it seems like the host-side bindings should be able to group all these together as well.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
Ah the
async_io
name doesn't show up at all, that's just to contain everything and then reexport only the bits we need. The only modules here arebindings
andbindings::sync
, but these bindings are relatively rare to access since they're the raw traits/types that most embedders won't be working with.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
This is the old builder from
wasi-common
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
The main reason is that the auto-generated functions all take a closure that's
fn(&mut T) -> &mut U
but that's switched here to beT: WasiView
. Otherwise though, you're right, and it's something I've wanted to clean up for awhile.
alexcrichton updated PR #8228.
elliottt submitted PR review:
This looks great to me! Just a few questions/suggestions.
elliottt submitted PR review:
This looks great to me! Just a few questions/suggestions.
elliottt created PR review comment:
Why don't we consume
self
here?
elliottt created PR review comment:
/// Directories can be limited to being readonly. This will restrict what /// can be done with them, for example preventing creation of new files.
elliottt created PR review comment:
// These interfaces come from the outer module, as it's
alexcrichton updated PR #8228.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
You can find more discussion of that here
alexcrichton requested elliottt for a review on PR #8228.
elliottt submitted PR review:
:shipit:
alexcrichton merged PR #8228.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC