Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 22 2024 at 09:20): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 22 2024 at 09:20):arlyon opened PR #8217 from arlyon:bump-tokio-rustls to bytecodealliance:main:
Note that rustls is not on the latest minor since tokio-rustls
has not updated yet.<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 22 2024 at 09:20):arlyon requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 22 2024 at 09:20):arlyon requested fitzgen for a review on PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 22 2024 at 09:20):arlyon requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 25 2024 at 22:13):alexcrichton commented on PR #8217:
Thanks for the PR!
Per project policy we require
cargo vetentries for all our dependencies, so we'll project maintainers to vet these new dependencies and push them either as a parallel PR for this to rebase onto or to this PR itself.I checked initially and these are pretty substantial updates to vet, so to help motivate a bit, can you detail a bit more why this is needed? Is this a "generally good to stay up to date" style PR or perhaps more urgent along the lines of "must fix a bug" or "must only have one library in the crate graph" style problem?
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 28 2024 at 19:51):alexcrichton commented on PR #8217:
I was additionally inspired by this PR and brought up
cargo vetat today's Wasmtime meeting which led to https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/8259 which will relax the vet rules slightly here.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 29 2024 at 16:32):alexcrichton updated PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 29 2024 at 16:33):alexcrichton commented on PR #8217:
Ok under our new policy for vets I've added necessary exemptions to this PR. I've additionally updated the
ureqdependency silghtly to avoid pulling in two versions of rustls/ring.Thanks for the patience here @arlyon!
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 29 2024 at 16:33):alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 29 2024 at 17:27):No worries I realise you ended up doing most of the work here so I appreciate the effort. Have a nice weekend! :)
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 29 2024 at 17:28):alexcrichton submitted PR review.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 29 2024 at 18:48):arlyon edited a comment on PR #8217:
No worries I realise you ended up doing most of the work here so I appreciate the effort. Have a nice weekend! :) For context it was mostly a 'lets get everything over to http@1 for which rustls was a blocker in my dep tree
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 01 2024 at 13:53):alexcrichton updated PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 01 2024 at 13:53):alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #8217.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 01 2024 at 14:52):alexcrichton merged PR #8217.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC