saulecabrera opened PR #8194 from saulecabrera:winch-mem64
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Closes: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/8089
This commit unlocks support for the
memory64
proposal in Winch. After all the fixes to heap handling, all the spec and misc tests are passing, which is a good indication regarding the support for this proposal.I'll like to merge this change after: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/8156.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
saulecabrera requested elliottt for a review on PR #8194.
saulecabrera requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #8194.
saulecabrera requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #8194.
saulecabrera requested fitzgen for a review on PR #8194.
saulecabrera requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #8194.
elliottt submitted PR review:
:tada:
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8194:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen, @saulecabrera
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "winch"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
- saulecabrera: winch
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
alexcrichton merged PR #8194.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC