alexcrichton requested jameysharp for a review on PR #8172.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #8172.
alexcrichton opened PR #8172 from alexcrichton:remove-call-indirect-typecheck
to bytecodealliance:main
:
This commit implements an optimization to skip type checks in
call_indirect
for tables that don't require it. With the
function-references proposal it's possible to have tables of a single
type of function as opposed to today's defaultfuncref
which is a
heterogenous set of functions. In this situation it's possible that a
call_indirect
's type tag matches the type tag of a
table
-of-typed-funcref
-values, meaning that it's impossible for the
type check to fail.The type check of a function pointer in
call_indirect
is refactored
here to take the table's type into account. Various things are shuffled
around to ensure that the right traps still show up in the right places
but the important part is that, when possible, the type check is omitted
entirely.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #8172.
jameysharp submitted PR review:
This makes sense to me! I really like the way you've restructured things with the
CheckIndirectCallTypeSignature
enum.
jameysharp submitted PR review:
This makes sense to me! I really like the way you've restructured things with the
CheckIndirectCallTypeSignature
enum.
jameysharp created PR review comment:
Extreme nit-pick:
// succeeds then we know it won't match, so trap anyway.
alexcrichton updated PR #8172.
alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #8172.
fitzgen submitted PR review.
fitzgen submitted PR review.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
FWIW, when the GC proposal is enabled, the static immediate type on the
call_indirect
will be allowed to be a subtype of the actual function's type.We don't implement this yet, but will need to.
https://webassembly.github.io/gc/core/exec/instructions.html#exec-call-indirect
alexcrichton merged PR #8172.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
Oh good point! I keep consistently forgetting that contra/covariance applies to params/results...
This makes me think we should remove the
PartialEq
implementation for types in wasmtime-types like we did in the embedder API as well
fitzgen submitted PR review.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Yeah that wouldn't be a bad idea.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC