alexcrichton opened PR #8121 from alexcrichton:fuzz-more-wast
to bytecodealliance:main
:
Currently we have a
spectest
fuzzer which uses fuzz input to generate an arbitrary configuration for Wasmtime and then executes the spec test. This ensures that no matter the configuration Wasmtime can pass spec tests. This commit expands this testing to include all*.wast
tests we have in this repository. While we don't have a ton we still have some significant ones like in #8118 which will only reproduce when turning knobs on CPU features.<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton requested elliottt for a review on PR #8121.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #8121.
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #8121.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #8121.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #8121:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
alexcrichton updated PR #8121.
alexcrichton updated PR #8121.
fitzgen submitted PR review:
Nice!
fitzgen merged PR #8121.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC