Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #8012 Add regression test for issue #7999


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 14:06):

fitzgen requested cfallin for a review on PR #8012.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 14:06):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #8012.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 14:06):

fitzgen opened PR #8012 from fitzgen:issue-7999-test-case to bytecodealliance:main:

Follow up to #8005 and #7999

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 15:27):

cfallin submitted PR review:

Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 15:55):

cfallin merged PR #8012.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 18:29):

bjorn3 submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2024 at 18:29):

bjorn3 created PR review comment:

Without the precise-output flag set you have to add explicit filecheck match statement like ; check: return v10 ; v10 = 0

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 29 2024 at 18:31):

fitzgen submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 29 2024 at 18:31):

fitzgen created PR review comment:

Whoops, didn't realize I was missing a check: here, thanks!


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC