Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #7982 winch: Refactor the prologue and epil...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 19:43):

elliottt opened PR #7982 from elliottt:trevor/winch-refactor-prologue to bytecodealliance:main:

Rework the winch prologue and epilogue definitions as default implementations in the MacroAssembler trait, naming the common sequence of frame setup, check stack, handle clobbers, and reserve space for locals. This change also allows us to remove the special prologue and epilogue functions from the trampoline module, and rely instead on the same function used by the normal function compilation path.

As I moved the pinning of the vmctx register to after the prologue, this change had a pretty noisy effect on the filetests.

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 19:43):

elliottt requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #7982.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 19:43):

elliottt requested abrown for a review on PR #7982.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 19:43):

elliottt updated PR #7982.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 19:43):

elliottt requested saulecabrera for a review on PR #7982.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 20:44):

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #7982:

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @saulecabrera

<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "winch"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.

Learn more.
</details>

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 20:50):

saulecabrera submitted PR review:

One minor question. Else looks reasonable to me, thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 20:50):

saulecabrera submitted PR review:

One minor question. Else looks reasonable to me, thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 20:50):

saulecabrera created PR review comment:

Could we do self.masm.epilogue(&self.callee_saved_regs, spill_size) here?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 22:13):

elliottt submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 22:13):

elliottt created PR review comment:

We could, but at that point i wonder if we should move the stack allocation out of the prologue and epilogue. What do you think about not including the reserve/free calls?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 22:17):

elliottt updated PR #7982.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 22:19):

saulecabrera submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 22:19):

saulecabrera created PR review comment:

Yeah, that makes sense to me as well.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 22:35):

elliottt updated PR #7982.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 22 2024 at 23:18):

elliottt merged PR #7982.


Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC