abrown edited PR #7609.
alexcrichton commented on PR #7609:
The
bytesize
crate looks vet-able relatively easily but looks likeproc-maps
is a pretty heavyweight dependency pulling in quite a lot. Could that dependency be dropped in favor of parsing/proc/self/maps
manually?
alexcrichton submitted PR review:
Neat! I like having little example programs like this.
alexcrichton submitted PR review:
Neat! I like having little example programs like this.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
Since this is the start of the program this can actually be
env_logger::init()
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
You may want to note here that this documentation only applies to Linux. You may also want to note that MPK only works on Linux too here (in case anyone lands here first)
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #7609:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @peterhuene
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:config"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- peterhuene: wasmtime:api
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #7609:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Config
method, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config
][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstruct
s).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
abrown updated PR #7609.
abrown has marked PR #7609 as ready for review.
abrown requested pchickey for a review on PR #7609.
abrown requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #7609.
abrown requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #7609.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
abrown updated PR #7609.
abrown has enabled auto merge for PR #7609.
abrown updated PR #7609.
abrown has enabled auto merge for PR #7609.
abrown updated PR #7609.
abrown has enabled auto merge for PR #7609.
abrown merged PR #7609.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC