alexcrichton opened PR #6900 from alexcrichton:update-rust
to bytecodealliance:main
:
After writing this PR I'm instead though left with the question of "should we do this?" In my opinion we should update Rust via one of two mechanisms:
- Preemptively update when anyone has the time after a release is made
- Only update when a feature is desired from the new release
Personally I'm a fan of being in camp (1) but there's points to camp (2) as well. My worry about (2) is that it incentivises not updating and tends to encourage workarounds when there's typically no need to do so since practically everyone is running the latest stable anyway.
alexcrichton requested elliottt for a review on PR #6900.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #6900.
elliottt submitted PR review.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #6900.
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #6900.
alexcrichton updated PR #6900.
alexcrichton updated PR #6900.
alexcrichton updated PR #6900.
alexcrichton updated PR #6900.
cfallin submitted PR review:
LGTM for latest updates; thanks!
cfallin created PR review comment:
While we're here, could we update this for Cranelift as well? We're no longer included in the mozilla-central tree and aren't subject to their Rust version policies anymore; it's probably uncontroversial to say now that Cranelift will follow the same policy as Wasmtime?
cfallin submitted PR review:
LGTM for latest updates; thanks!
alexcrichton updated PR #6900.
fitzgen submitted PR review.
alexcrichton updated PR #6900.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC