afonso360 opened PR #6879 from afonso360:opt-bitselect
to bytecodealliance:main
:
:wave: Hey,
While working on #6876, I noticed we don't yet recognize this pattern for bitselects. I've also added the various permutations of this rule since I don't think we rotate inputs on bitwise operations.
afonso360 requested fitzgen for a review on PR #6879.
afonso360 requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #6879.
afonso360 edited PR #6879:
:wave: Hey,
While working on #6876, I noticed we don't yet recognize this pattern for bitselects. I've also added the various permutations of this rule since I don't think we rotate inputs on bitwise operations. (And my understanding is that we shouldn't do so)
fitzgen submitted PR review:
LGTM, but can we please add some runtests as well? Thanks!
A bit of an aside, but it also makes me think that we should make the runtest runner automatically run tests twice, once with optimizations and once without them. Because we want that for every single runtest that exercises any mid-end rewrite rule, and it definitely doesn't hurt for runtests that are just stressing lowering or something.
afonso360 updated PR #6879.
afonso360 updated PR #6879.
afonso360 updated PR #6879.
jameysharp submitted PR review:
That's a good restriction to adopt for now and a good assortment of new tests. Thanks!
afonso360 merged PR #6879.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC