jeffcharles opened PR #6538 from jeffcharles:winch-add-int-binary-instructions
to bytecodealliance:main
:
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Part of #6528. Adds x86 support for a number of integer binary instructions to Winch.
jeffcharles requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #6538.
jeffcharles requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #6538.
jeffcharles requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #6538.
jeffcharles requested abrown for a review on PR #6538.
saulecabrera submitted PR review:
Left one comment regarding handling of invalid operand combinations. After that I think we can get this landed.
saulecabrera submitted PR review:
Left one comment regarding handling of invalid operand combinations. After that I think we can get this landed.
saulecabrera created PR review comment:
I believe for this and all the other functions below, we can use
Self::handle_invalid_operand_combination
?
jeffcharles created PR review comment:
I also noticed I can substitute
self.load_constant
forself.move_ir
when loading a larger than 32-bit integer into the scratch register so I'll make that change too.
jeffcharles updated PR #6538.
jeffcharles requested saulecabrera for a review on PR #6538.
saulecabrera submitted PR review.
saulecabrera merged PR #6538.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC