mrcnski opened PR #6420 from mrcnski:benchmark-deserialize
to bytecodealliance:main
:
PULL REQUEST
Overview
I was curious how
deserialize
compared withdeserialize_file
. There was already abench_deserialize_module
so I expanded it to supportdeserialize
.Some results:
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Warming up for 3.0000 s Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.4918 s (50k iterations) Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Analyzing deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm time: [107.44 µs 108.00 µs 108.56 µs] Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%) 6 (6.00%) high mild 3 (3.00%) high severe Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Warming up for 3.0000 s Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0337 s (56k iterations) Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Analyzing deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm time: [89.572 µs 89.705 µs 89.872 µs] Found 14 outliers among 100 measurements (14.00%) 9 (9.00%) high mild 5 (5.00%) high severe
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
mrcnski requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #6420.
mrcnski requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #6420.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC