Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #6420 Add benchmark for `Module::deserializ...

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 21 2023 at 15:41):

mrcnski edited PR #6420:

PULL REQUEST

Overview

I was curious how deserialize compared with deserialize_file. There was already a bench_deserialize_module so I expanded it to support deserialize.

Some results:

Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.4918 s (50k iterations)
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Analyzing
deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm
                        time:   [107.44 µs 108.00 µs 108.56 µs]
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
  6 (6.00%) high mild
  3 (3.00%) high severe
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0337 s (56k iterations)
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Analyzing
deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm
                        time:   [89.572 µs 89.705 µs 89.872 µs]
Found 14 outliers among 100 measurements (14.00%)
  9 (9.00%) high mild
  5 (5.00%) high severe

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

• If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
  conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".

• Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
  this can be brief.

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 21 2023 at 15:41):

mrcnski edited PR #6420:

PULL REQUEST

Overview

I was curious how Module::deserialize compared with deserialize_file. There was already a bench_deserialize_module so I expanded it to support deserialize.

Some results:

Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.4918 s (50k iterations)
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm: Analyzing
deserialize/deserialize/wasi.wasm
                        time:   [107.44 µs 108.00 µs 108.56 µs]
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
  6 (6.00%) high mild
  3 (3.00%) high severe
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0337 s (56k iterations)
Benchmarking deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm: Analyzing
deserialize/deserialize_file/wasi.wasm
                        time:   [89.572 µs 89.705 µs 89.872 µs]
Found 14 outliers among 100 measurements (14.00%)
  9 (9.00%) high mild
  5 (5.00%) high severe

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

• If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
  conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".

• Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
  this can be brief.

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 22 2023 at 14:54):

alexcrichton submitted PR review:

Thanks!

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 22 2023 at 15:34):

alexcrichton merged PR #6420.

Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC