Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #6228 Make streams owned by request/respons...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2023 at 04:15):

brendandburns opened PR #6228 from brendandburns:ptr to bytecodealliance:main:

This is related to the discussion here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-http/issues/24

Where we decided that streams should be child-own properties of the request or response that they are tied to.

This adds clarity to when it is valid to drop an input or output stream and in what order relative to the response.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2023 at 04:15):

brendandburns requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2023 at 04:15):

brendandburns requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 18 2023 at 18:29):

alexcrichton requested pchickey for a review on PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

Doesn't with_context work here?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

nit; since we only care about the Some case, how about an if let Some(r) = self.requests.get(&request) instead?

Or even

if let Entry::Occupied(e) = self.requests.entry(request) {
   let r = e.remove();

https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/hash_map/struct.OccupiedEntry.html#method.remove

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

If we had a Default trait impl, this could have just called Self::default()

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

How about a derive(Default)?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

You wouldn't need this clone if the call to buf.len below was moved higher, before the match.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

If we had Default implemented, this could have been unwrap_or_default

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

Looking at the usages of this struct, it seems that a From<Bytes> implementation could really clear this up

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 06:39):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

If there was a From implementation, this could have been Stream::from(new.freeze())

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:52):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

Unfortunately, HashMap::get(...) returns a reference rather than a value, and there's no default for a reference. I could implement the Default trait for &Stream references, but I'm not sure if that's what is best. Let me know.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:52):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

done.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:52):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

done.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:53):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

I'm not sure I'm following your suggestion, can you clarify?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:53):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

done.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:53):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

added.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:53):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

done.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 21:54):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

Done.

Thanks for the suggestion, I'm still learning idiomatic rust)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:11):

brendandburns updated PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:12):

brendandburns updated PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:22):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

Sure, I'm referring to this method on the anyhow::Context trait https://docs.rs/anyhow/latest/anyhow/trait.Context.html#tymethod.with_context

If it's in scope, you should be able to call context or with_context (usually used with format! and similar) on most Result and all Option types directly, thus eliminating the need for ok_or_else and explicit anyhow! invocation

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:35):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

That makes sense, I think this is fine.
I am making a few changes here to allow for the host to provide a custom connect implementation, so I'll take a deeper look at this as well next week

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:40):

rvolosatovs submitted PR review:

Just a general question, why are we not modifying the stream data buffer, but rather cloning it? In other words, why would we ever want to read the same bytes more than once?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:40):

rvolosatovs submitted PR review:

Just a general question, why are we not modifying the stream data buffer, but rather cloning it? In other words, why would we ever want to read the same bytes more than once?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 19 2023 at 22:40):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

This should probably also use the From trait

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 16:57):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

done.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 17:57):

pchickey created PR review comment:

I made those ok_or_else(|| anyhow!(...)) suggestions in a prior PR and wasn't aware that Context could do that for me. Thank you.

@brendandburns The suggested change here is let st = self.streams.get_mut(&stream).with_context(|| format!("stream not found: {stream}"))?;, or maybe even ....get_mut(&stream).context("stream not found")? if leaving out the stream number is ok - and it probably is, because (at least when using the component linker, I'm not sure if it works in module mode) bindgen is inserting tracing statements which someone debugging can recover the values of the arguments from.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 17:58):

pchickey edited PR review comment.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:01):

pchickey submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:01):

pchickey submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:01):

pchickey created PR review comment:

                    bail!("cannot write to closed stream");

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:09):

rvolosatovs submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:09):

rvolosatovs submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:09):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

From https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/6228#issuecomment-1516661764, as you said, I think I'd just use BytesMut and https://docs.rs/bytes/latest/bytes/struct.BytesMut.html#method.extend_from_slice here

This that would be quite a bit shorter, it could probably also make sense to remove the match altogether and instead rely on https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/hash_map/enum.Entry.html#method.and_modify (see example there with or_insert)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 18:10):

rvolosatovs edited PR review comment.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 19:53):

brendandburns updated PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 22:59):

brendandburns updated PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 20 2023 at 22:59):

brendandburns created PR review comment:

Done. I needed to use .or_default().extend_from_slice(...) but I think it achieves the same goal (and thanks for the suggestion of implementing Default that made it possible :)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 21 2023 at 18:57):

pchickey merged PR #6228.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 24 2023 at 14:44):

rvolosatovs created PR review comment:

https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/6272


Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 13:07 UTC