afonso360 opened PR #5847 from riscv-bitmanip-flags
to main
:
This PR clarifies our bit manipulation set of ISA flags.
It seems that our current "B" extension is the full set of instructions defined in the Bit-Manipulation extension (pdf). However we should be querying each extension individually since some processors may not implement all of them.
Additionally it may cause confusion with the currently reserved B extension defined in Chapter 19 of the ISA (pdf). These are unrelated and there is no connection between "B" and the various extensions defined in the Bit-Manipulation spec.
As an example, the SiFive U74 implements only a subset of these (Zbb, Zba) so it wouldn't qualify for most of these optimizations previously, despite most of them only needing Zbb.
afonso360 edited PR #5847 from riscv-bitmanip-flags
to main
:
This PR clarifies our bit manipulation set of ISA flags.
It seems that our current "B" extension is the full set of instructions defined in the Bit-Manipulation spec (pdf). However we should be querying each extension individually since some processors may not implement all of them.
Additionally it may cause confusion with the currently reserved B extension defined in Chapter 19 of the ISA (pdf). These are unrelated and there is no connection between "B" and the various extensions defined in the Bit-Manipulation spec.
As an example, the SiFive U74 implements only a subset of these (Zbb, Zba) so it wouldn't qualify for most of these optimizations previously, despite most of them only needing Zbb.
jameysharp submitted PR review.
afonso360 merged PR #5847.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC