alexcrichton opened PR #5763 from fuse-bnot-bxor
to main
:
I originally thought that s390x's original lowering in #5709, but as was rightfully pointed out
(bnot (bxor x y))
is equivalent to(bxor x (bnot y))
so the special lowering for one should apply as a special lowering for the other. For the s390x and aarch64 backend that have already have a fused lowering of the bxor/bnot add a lowering additionally for the bnot/bxor combination.<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
elliottt submitted PR review.
elliottt created PR review comment:
vr128_ty
matches$I128
, should this be lower priority than the new rule on line 1058?
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
To confirm though, these are different architectures so I don't think there's overlap?
elliottt submitted PR review.
elliottt created PR review comment:
Whoops! Sorry about that :)
elliottt submitted PR review.
alexcrichton updated PR #5763 from fuse-bnot-bxor
to main
.
alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #5763.
alexcrichton merged PR #5763.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC