Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #5745 Move jump tables to the DataFlowGraph

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 08 2023 at 01:14):

elliottt opened PR #5745 from trevor/jump-tables to main:

<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 08 2023 at 01:17):

elliottt edited PR #5745 from trevor/jump-tables to main:

Move the storage for jump tables off of FunctionStencil and onto DataFlowGraph. This change is in service of #5731, making it easier to access the jump table data in the context of helpers like inst_values.

Moving the jump table data to DataFlowGraph is reasonable, as we are now assuming in more than one place that a jump table entry is used by at most one br_table instruction. As such, it's now more instruction side-data, rather than function side-data, and makes more sense to store in the DataFlowGraph.

<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 08 2023 at 01:18):

elliottt edited PR #5745 from trevor/jump-tables to main:

Move the storage for jump tables off of FunctionStencil and onto DataFlowGraph. This change is in service of #5731, making it easier to access the jump table data in the context of helpers like inst_values.

Moving the jump table data to DataFlowGraph is reasonable, as we are now assuming in more than one place that a jump table entry is used by at most one br_table instruction. As such, it's now more instruction side-data, rather than function side-data, and makes more sense to store in the DataFlowGraph.

One open question I have is whether or not we should lock down the interface to DataFlowGraph::jump_tables in the same way that we have insts and blocks. There could be some value in restricting it, but as we didn't when it was public on FunctionStencil, I left it as a PrimaryMap.

<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 08 2023 at 01:18):

jameysharp submitted PR review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 08 2023 at 01:18):

elliottt has marked PR #5745 as ready for review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 08 2023 at 05:21):

elliottt merged PR #5745.

Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC