jameysharp opened PR #5318 from isle-errors
to main
:
There were several issues with ISLE's existing error reporting implementation.
- When using Miette for more readable error reports, it would panic if errors were reported from multiple files in the same run.
- Miette is pretty heavy-weight for what we're doing, with a lot of dependencies.
- The
Error::Errors
enum variant led to normalization steps in many places, to avoid using that variant to represent a single error.This commit:
- replaces Miette with codespan-reporting
- gets rid of a bunch of cargo-vet exemptions
- replaces the
Error::Errors
variant with a newErrors
type- removes source info from
Error
variants so they're easy to construct- adds source info only when formatting
Errors
- formats
Errors
with a customDebug
impl- shares common code between ISLE's callers, islec and cranelift-codegen
- includes a source snippet even with fancy-errors disabled
I tried to make this a series of smaller commits but I couldn't find any good split points; everything was too entangled with everything else.
I still need to test this with input that actually has errors in it, but I wanted to get early review at this point since it at least builds cleanly both with and without the
fancy-errors
feature.
jameysharp requested fitzgen for a review on PR #5318.
jameysharp updated PR #5318 from isle-errors
to main
.
jameysharp updated PR #5318 from isle-errors
to main
.
jameysharp updated PR #5318 from isle-errors
to main
.
jameysharp has marked PR #5318 as ready for review.
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Likewise here, for deploy -> run.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Can you say more about this exemption update? As far as I understood it, we decided we wouldn't add any more exemptions past the initial set that we had when we adopted cargo-vet, so this might need a true audit rather than an expanded exemption. (But I don't claim to fully understand our policies and cargo-vet subtleties here, so others please feel free to chime in too...)
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Ah, actually, reading more, it seems that
safe-to-run
is a subset ofsafe-to-deploy
(a weaker claim), so this is a downgrade and should be automatically fine; does that match your understanding? Was this change due to some indication that we didn't need the wider claim anymore?
jameysharp submitted PR review.
jameysharp created PR review comment:
I didn't think about it too hard because this is something
cargo vet
did automatically, and I figured it knew what it was doing. But I believe this is weakening the exemption. If I understand correctly,safe-to-deploy
impliessafe-to-run
, but not the other way around, so with this change we're no longer saying we trust these exempted crates as much as we did before.
jameysharp created PR review comment:
Jinx :laughing:
All the changes to
config.toml
are because Miette had a bunch of dependencies while codespan-reporting only depends on a couple of crates, which I guess we were already using elsewhere.termcolor
is used byclap
,cranelift-tools
, and others, whileunicode-width
is used byclap
,wast
, and others.
jameysharp submitted PR review.
jameysharp merged PR #5318.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC