elliottt opened PR #5222 from trevor/vreg-allocator
to main
:
<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
elliottt updated PR #5222 from trevor/vreg-allocator
to main
.
elliottt edited PR #5222 from trevor/vreg-allocator
to main
:
Remove the dependency on
VCode
forVReg
allocation. This will simplify the changes in #5172, as that PR introduces the need to allocate temporary registers from the ABI context.<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
elliottt edited PR #5222 from trevor/vreg-allocator
to main
:
Remove the dependency on
VCode
forVReg
allocation. This will simplify the changes in #5172, as that PR introduces the need to allocate temporary registers from the ABI context.This change also allows us to remove some fields from
VCode
:reftyped_vregs_set
andhave_ref_values
. Additionally, thevcode_types
field appears to be only used for its length after theVCode
is built, so we could probably replace that field with au32
as well.<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
elliottt has marked PR #5222 as ready for review.
elliottt requested cfallin for a review on PR #5222.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC