Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #5132 Generate more fixed_nonallocatable co...

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Nov 19 2022 at 09:13):

elliottt edited PR #5132 from trevor/ssa-assertions to main:

Add assertions to the OperandCollector that show we're not using pinned vregs, and use reg_fixed_nonallocatable constraints when a real register is used with other constraint generation functions like reg_use etc.

I experimented with adding debug assertions that the reused operand referenced in reg_reuse_def constraints was compatible with the new constraint that would be generated. This didn't end up being possible as some backends will recursively process instructions when collecting operands, making it impossible without more invasive changes to tell where that operand is in the operand vector. Given that we would need to plumb through somewhat substantial changes to support adding debug assertions, I decided that rephrasing the existing warning comment about real registers would be good enough.
<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Nov 19 2022 at 09:14):

elliottt edited PR #5132 from trevor/ssa-assertions to main:

Add assertions to the OperandCollector that show we're not using pinned vregs, and use reg_fixed_nonallocatable constraints when a real register is used with other constraint generation functions like reg_use etc.

I experimented with adding debug assertions that the reused operand referenced in reg_reuse_def constraints was compatible with the new constraint that would be generated. This didn't end up being possible as some backends will recursively process instructions when collecting operands, making it impossible without more invasive changes to tell where that operand is in the operand vector. Given that we would need to plumb through somewhat substantial changes to support adding debug assertions, I decided that rephrasing the existing warning comment about real registers would be good enough.
<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Nov 19 2022 at 09:15):

elliottt has marked PR #5132 as ready for review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Nov 28 2022 at 17:29):

elliottt requested cfallin for a review on PR #5132.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Nov 28 2022 at 17:55):

cfallin submitted PR review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Nov 28 2022 at 18:31):

elliottt merged PR #5132.

Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC