cfallin requested elliottt for a review on PR #4892.
cfallin requested fitzgen for a review on PR #4892.
cfallin opened PR #4892 from abi-reg-constraints
to main
:
This PR updates the shared ABI code and backends to use register-operand constraints rather than explicit pinned-vreg moves for register arguments and return values.
The s390x backend was not updated, because it has its own implementation of ABI code. Ideally we could converge back to the code shared by x64 and aarch64 (which didn't exist when s390x ported calls to ISLE, so the current situation is underestandable, to be clear!). I'll leave this for future work.
This PR exposed several places where regalloc2 needed to be a bit more flexible with constraints; it requires regalloc2#74 to be merged and pulled in. Right now CI will fail because
Cargo.toml
points to a local checkout; I'll update this after
the regalloc2 changes are in.<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
cfallin requested bnjbvr for a review on PR #4892.
fitzgen submitted PR review.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
- Can we type def this small vec since it is used all over the place?
- This change is doubling the size of these small vecs since each element is two regs instead of one now, and I wonder if it makes sense to cut the inline capacity in half? Or at least remeasure a little to see where the sweet spot is now?
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Let's debug assert that this isn't a call the probestack libcall here, since we rely on probestacks being inserted after regalloc and use that fact to justify avoiding listing their uses as an optimization. This way, if we ever start probestacking earlier, we will hit this assertion and be reminded to fix up that code.
fitzgen submitted PR review.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Why 4? Is that the max that this will ever use? If so, then it should probably be an
arrayvec
instead. If not, I think we can go larger since this is just a one-off vector in a stack frame, not something where we have to worry too much about the size of the smallvec because it is inside a bunch of heap allocated structs.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Should probably update the docs for this trait method. We shouldn't clobber caller-saved registers anymore right? Instead we should use the given temps if needed, correct?
fitzgen created PR review comment:
nitpick: Line wrap is a bit funky here.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
We could allow taking the signatures out of the context temporarily, so that we could immutably borrow them while mutably borrowing the lowering context. This would avoid needing to pre-allocate temps up front.
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Similarly:
&ABIArgSlot::Reg { extension: ir::ArgumentExtension::None, ty, .. } => ty.is_ref() as _, &ABIArgSlot::Reg { .. } => 1,
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Could code golf this down a little bit, if you wanted:
&ABIArgSlot::Stack { extension: ir::ArgumentExtension::None, .. } => 0, &ABIArgSlot::Stack { .. } => 1,
fitzgen created PR review comment:
Kinda strange to have two different kinds of comments here? Should
#
just be;
?
cfallin updated PR #4892 from abi-reg-constraints
to main
.
cfallin updated PR #4892 from abi-reg-constraints
to main
.
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
;
is actually not a comment in the generated assembly format, though -- the punctuation above breaks down as:
- initial column
;
isfilecheck
's comment, and serves here to give theprecise-output
expected text- the
;
s in line 45 separate additional instructions (ldr
, thenb
, then adata
pseudoinstruction)- the
#
on line 46 introduces an actual comment that gives more info about the callso the
; ... # ...
is a comment-within-a-comment, if that makes sense...
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Fixed, thanks!
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
True, though imho that is probably best done as a follow-up refactor...
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Good point, updated to 16; it's bounded only by the number of args so it could be larger.
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Took almost this, just a bit different -- I kept the
extension != None
as a guard-if
on the match arm, as it reads more clearly to me that way, semantically (the case we want to handle is "has extension", not "has no extension", so the subpattern match doesn't work as well).
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Updated!
cfallin created PR review comment:
Added!
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin submitted PR review.
cfallin created PR review comment:
Added typedefs! I kept the size at
8
as IMHO it's important to avoid heap allocs for most functions here, and when I've looked before, there are a good number with more than four args. Once we have a stats framework this would be a good thing to rexamine though, I agree.
cfallin updated PR #4892 from abi-reg-constraints
to main
.
cfallin updated PR #4892 from abi-reg-constraints
to main
.
cfallin has marked PR #4892 as ready for review.
cfallin has enabled auto merge for PR #4892.
cfallin has disabled auto merge for PR #4892.
cfallin updated PR #4892 from abi-reg-constraints
to main
.
cfallin has enabled auto merge for PR #4892.
cfallin merged PR #4892.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC