Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #3352 Add `Store::consume_fuel` to manually...

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 15:03):

alexcrichton opened PR #3352 from consume-fuel to main:

This can be useful for host functions that want to consume fuel to
reflect their relative cost. Additionally it's a relatively easy
addition to have and someone's asking for it!

Closes #3315

<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 16:13):

fitzgen submitted PR review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 16:13):

fitzgen submitted PR review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 16:13):

fitzgen created PR review comment:

Maybe saturating arithmetic is the right thing to do here instead of returning an error? Unsure.

I guess we could punt that saturate-or-not decision to the embedder since they can check fuel_consumed and compare it to the fuel added to clamp the amount of fuel to consume when calling this method. Might make sense to have a fuel_remaining method so they don't have to remember how much fuel was added and do that comparison themselves.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 18:09):

alexcrichton submitted PR review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 18:09):

alexcrichton created PR review comment:

I figure this is something we'll probably tweak over time yeah. The precise interfaces here aren't exhasutively considered and bike-shedded, rather they're mostly just situation-solving feature requests as we get them. For now I figured you could get fuel_remaining with consume_fuel(0), but we can always add another path if necessary in the future too.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 15 2021 at 18:10):

alexcrichton merged PR #3352.

Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC