Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #3105 Add support for Saturating Rounding Q...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 21 2021 at 18:25):

jlb6740 opened PR #3105 from implement-sat-int-q-round-mul to main:

<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 21 2021 at 18:30):

jlb6740 updated PR #3105 from implement-sat-int-q-round-mul to main.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:01):

jlb6740 updated PR #3105 from implement-sat-int-q-round-mul to main.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:02):

jlb6740 requested abrown for a review on PR #3105.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:02):

jlb6740 requested cfallin for a review on PR #3105.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:06):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:06):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:06):

cfallin created PR review comment:

s/optimial/optimal/

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:06):

cfallin created PR review comment:

Why was movdqa removed here?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 26 2021 at 21:06):

cfallin created PR review comment:

Could you remove the added space here?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 02:56):

jlb6740 submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 02:56):

jlb6740 created PR review comment:

@cfallin I am actually a little confused here because I thought I introduced this during the same patch only to remove it during an amend. In any case I removed it because I questioned the correct encoding. I avoided using the instruction directly and just used the gen_move call.

About my concern on the encoding, specifically the encodings are:

66 0F 6F /r | MOVDQA xmm1, xmm2/m128

or

66 0F 7F /r | MOVDQA xmm2/m128, xmm1

I think the former should be used, not the later. I also noticed that Movdqu also uses the later. This frankly was a todo to understand but in the moment I just used the gen_move as I noted above.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 02:58):

jlb6740 updated PR #3105 from implement-sat-int-q-round-mul to main.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 02:59):

jlb6740 submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 02:59):

jlb6740 created PR review comment:

Given the approval I'll push this assuming your fine with it still being removed.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 03:12):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 03:12):

cfallin created PR review comment:

OK, makes sense -- in any case it's clear it's not used since the thing still compiles and works in CI!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jul 27 2021 at 03:32):

jlb6740 merged PR #3105.


Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC