Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #3035 Enable the simd_i16x8_q15mulr_sat_s t...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 15:29):

akirilov-arm opened PR #3035 from simd_i16x8_q15mulr_sat_s to main.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:51):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:51):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:51):

cfallin created PR review comment:

The consolidation of all of the unimplemented!() cases into the wildcard match below, here and in the other matches (s390x, x64, interpreter), is definitely valid, but IMHO at least, listing the unimplemented opcodes explicitly serves a useful purpose: it ensures that we don't miss an opcode when we go to eventually implement functionality. Tests also ensure this in a way, but that's more indirect (relies on 100% test coverage); and it is also useful sometimes to actually see what is missing.

Open to other views on this, though; especially interested in what @abrown @jlb6740 @uweigand think, as other backend-focused folks.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:53):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:53):

cfallin created PR review comment:

(And ConstAddr where I placed this line-comment maybe isn't the best example, but e.g. all the SIMD loads were listed out in s390x, whereas an implementer would now likely go through a run-tests, fix-one-panic, retry loop to find all that's needed.)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:54):

uweigand submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 16:54):

uweigand created PR review comment:

Agreed, I'd also prefer unimplemented opcodes to be listed explicitly, for the very reason you give.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:09):

akirilov-arm submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:09):

akirilov-arm created PR review comment:

@cfallin I based this approach on the x64 backend, but I don't mind reverting to the previous one.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:11):

akirilov-arm edited PR review comment.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:12):

akirilov-arm edited PR review comment.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:26):

akirilov-arm submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:26):

akirilov-arm created PR review comment:

Also, with Rust there is a quick hack to check what is missing - just comment out the wildcard case and try to rebuild :-).

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:33):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:33):

cfallin created PR review comment:

Ah, yes, we are not consistent with the above in x64; thanks for pointing that out! I just created #3037 (and this was a good exercise as I learned about a few opcodes we hadn't filled in yet).

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:42):

akirilov-arm submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:42):

akirilov-arm created PR review comment:

Speaking of consistency - notice that both in the AArch64 and the s390x backends some matches use panic!() for unimplemented operations, while others - unimplemented!(). While it doesn't change program behaviour much, IMHO all should use the latter, so I can clean that up instead - open to opinions (from @uweigand as well).

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:44):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:44):

cfallin created PR review comment:

Ah, yes, that would be a welcome cleanup as well; thanks!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:48):

uweigand submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 25 2021 at 18:48):

uweigand created PR review comment:

Agreed!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 28 2021 at 16:14):

akirilov-arm updated PR #3035 from simd_i16x8_q15mulr_sat_s to main.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 28 2021 at 16:28):

cfallin submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 28 2021 at 16:49):

cfallin merged PR #3035.


Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC