Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 17:37): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 17:37):alexcrichton opened PR #2993 from clone-linker to main:
There's no real reason to not do this, and it can help with some
usability use cases!<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 17:44):peterhuene submitted PR review.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 18:02):sunfishcode created PR review comment:
It looks like all the fields are cloned; could this use
#[derive(Clone)]instead?
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 18:02):sunfishcode submitted PR review.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 18:04):pchickey submitted PR review.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 18:04):pchickey created PR review comment:
Deriving clone would constrain it to
T: Clonewhich is not what we want
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 18:11):sunfishcode submitted PR review.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 18:11):sunfishcode created PR review comment:
Ah, ok.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 16 2021 at 21:06):alexcrichton merged PR #2993.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC