abrown opened PR #2697 from i64x2-comparisons
to main
:
<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
abrown submitted PR Review.
abrown created PR Review Comment:
I'm not sure if this is actually true for aarch64; @akirilov-arm, do you know? I'll move it down to the "aarch and x64" block if this actually runs with that backend.
abrown updated PR #2697 from i64x2-comparisons
to main
.
abrown edited PR #2697 from i64x2-comparisons
to main
:
i64x2 comparison instructions were added recently to the Wasm SIMD proposal. This PR adds those instructions to the x64 backend. The lowerings for some of these instructions already existed but those that didn't--
i64x2.ge_s
andi64x2.le_s
--have been lowered by comparing the flipped operands withPCMPGTQ
(in effect, asking to emitlt
forge
andgt
forle
) and then negating the results.
abrown has marked PR #2697 as ready for review.
abrown requested cfallin and jlb6740 for a review on PR #2697.
abrown requested cfallin and jlb6740 for a review on PR #2697.
cfallin submitted PR Review.
abrown merged PR #2697.
akirilov-arm submitted PR Review.
akirilov-arm created PR Review Comment:
Yes, the I64X2 comparisons have been implemented in the AArch64 backend - they just haven't been tested so far.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC