Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #2246 Add WasiCtxBuilder::preopened_handle ...

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 04:06):

joshuawarner32 opened PR #2246 from preopened_handle to main:

<!--

Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.

• [ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
  here.

• [ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
  description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
  first.

• [ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.

• [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
  If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
  suggested reviewers on the right can help you.

Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 04:07):

joshuawarner32 edited PR #2246 from preopened_handle to main:

This will allow third-party libraries to implement their own VFS to expose to a wasi binary,
such as (for example) VFS implemenations that record all reads/writes done from wasi,
or purely user-space implementations of traditional filesystems.

Also modify the wasi-fs example to use this simplified & more powerful system.

(partial fix for #2232)

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 04:08):

joshuawarner32 updated PR #2246 from preopened_handle to main:

This will allow third-party libraries to implement their own VFS to expose to a wasi binary,
such as (for example) VFS implemenations that record all reads/writes done from wasi,
or purely user-space implementations of traditional filesystems.

Also modify the wasi-fs example to use this simplified & more powerful system.

(partial fix for #2232)

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 13:50):

sunfishcode submitted PR Review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 13:50):

sunfishcode submitted PR Review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 13:50):

sunfishcode created PR Review Comment:

Would it be possible to reimplement preopened_dir in terms of this function?

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 20:31):

joshuawarner32 created PR Review Comment:

That would require making the OsDir::try_from(dir) part happen directly in preopened_dir, rather than in the callback - which in turn requires either modifying the interface to return Result, or panicking (boo!), or making self.preopens be a collection of Result<PendingPreopen, ...> (which would be... weird).

Of those, I'd rather modify the interface to return result. Reporting errors earlier is generally better.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 20:31):

joshuawarner32 submitted PR Review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 20:46):

joshuawarner32 submitted PR Review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Sep 30 2020 at 20:46):

joshuawarner32 created PR Review Comment:

(That said, this feels like a distinct effort from just adding this one method)

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 07 2020 at 22:48):

sunfishcode submitted PR Review.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 07 2020 at 22:48):

sunfishcode created PR Review Comment:

Makes sense; thanks for looking into it!

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 13 2024 at 02:19):

alexcrichton closed without merge PR #2246.

Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 13 2024 at 02:19):

alexcrichton commented on PR #2246:

I'm going to close this as this is quite an old PR at this point and I believe the previous summary is still applicable.

Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC