Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #1942 Upgrade wasmparser to 0.58.0


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 29 2020 at 23:23):

abrown opened PR #1942 from update-wasmparser to main:

In order to get access to the newest SIMD instructions, I upgraded wasmparser to 0.58.0.

There are API changes in wasmparser that need to be resolved before we can merge this. I marked these with unimplemented!() // TODO in various places so that at least we could get this to compile. @yurydelendik, @alexcrichton (I think some of this has to do with module linking and I have seen you discuss that before): could you take a look through these and give me your thoughts on how to implement (or temporarily avoid implementing) these unimplemented! sections?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 29 2020 at 23:23):

abrown requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #1942.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 29 2020 at 23:23):

abrown requested alexcrichton and yurydelendik for a review on PR #1942.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 29 2020 at 23:25):

abrown updated PR #1942 from update-wasmparser to main:

In order to get access to the newest SIMD instructions, I upgraded wasmparser to 0.58.0.

There are API changes in wasmparser that need to be resolved before we can merge this. I marked these with unimplemented!() // TODO in various places so that at least we could get this to compile. @yurydelendik, @alexcrichton (I think some of this has to do with module linking and I have seen you discuss that before): could you take a look through these and give me your thoughts on how to implement (or temporarily avoid implementing) these unimplemented! sections?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 30 2020 at 15:45):

abrown updated PR #1942 from update-wasmparser to main:

In order to get access to the newest SIMD instructions, I upgraded wasmparser to 0.58.0.

There are API changes in wasmparser that need to be resolved before we can merge this. I marked these with unimplemented!() // TODO in various places so that at least we could get this to compile. @yurydelendik, @alexcrichton (I think some of this has to do with module linking and I have seen you discuss that before): could you take a look through these and give me your thoughts on how to implement (or temporarily avoid implementing) these unimplemented! sections?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 30 2020 at 16:06):

abrown has marked PR #1942 as ready for review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 30 2020 at 16:08):

alexcrichton merged PR #1942.


Last updated: Oct 23 2024 at 20:03 UTC