cfallin opened PR #1833 from multi-value-loop
to master
:
It appears that the CLIF generation for a branch to a loop label did not taken into account the possibility of loop-block parameters. I believe the correct semantics here (at least as far as I understood the spec) are to pop new versions of the loop params off the stack at the point of the branch.
This PR fixes
spec/multi-value/block-run.wast
in the newer version ofspec_testsuite
, which we aren't yet using in the wasmtime tree but which SpiderMonkey is. This bug was caught during integration of the multivalue work with SpiderMonkey.(The
loop-params.wast
test added in this PR is the one particular failing case fromblock-run.wast
.)<!--
Please ensure that the following steps are all taken care of before submitting
the PR.
[ ] This has been discussed in issue #..., or if not, please tell us why
here.[ ] A short description of what this does, why it is needed; if the
description becomes long, the matter should probably be discussed in an issue
first.[ ] This PR contains test cases, if meaningful.
- [ ] A reviewer from the core maintainer team has been assigned for this PR.
If you don't know who could review this, please indicate so. The list of
suggested reviewers on the right can help you.Please ensure all communication adheres to the code of conduct.
-->
cfallin requested bnjbvr for a review on PR #1833.
bnjbvr submitted PR Review.
cfallin merged PR #1833.
Last updated: Dec 23 2024 at 12:05 UTC