fitzgen opened PR #1824 from test-stack-maps
to master
:
One of the new tests introduced here is not passing yet, because it looks like Cranelift is generating incorrect stack frames / stack maps, but I'd like to get a second set of eyes on whether this is the expected result or not before I dive into debugging + fixing it.
Also, it would be nice if we could verify that my understanding of how Cranelift's stack maps are supposed to work is correct in the new doc comments.
@eqrion, could you take a look at this please? Thanks!
fitzgen requested eqrion for a review on PR #1824.
fitzgen submitted PR Review.
fitzgen submitted PR Review.
fitzgen created PR Review Comment:
This is the function that looks like it has an incorrect stack frame and stack map. See the comment and table for explanation.
eqrion submitted PR Review.
fitzgen updated PR #1824 from test-stack-maps
to master
:
One of the new tests introduced here is not passing yet, because it looks like Cranelift is generating incorrect stack frames / stack maps, but I'd like to get a second set of eyes on whether this is the expected result or not before I dive into debugging + fixing it.
Also, it would be nice if we could verify that my understanding of how Cranelift's stack maps are supposed to work is correct in the new doc comments.
@eqrion, could you take a look at this please? Thanks!
fitzgen has marked PR #1824 as ready for review.
fitzgen merged PR #1824.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 17:03 UTC