bnjbvr opened PR #1530 from bbouvier-arm64-fixes
to master
:
This rebases and adapts patches that landed in our arm64 work-in-progress branch after the last commit that was merged with the new arm64 backend.
Commit 8f181f8 is a bit invasive, because it propagates the
settings::Flags
down to the arm64 machinery, and the ABI has to be marked with the Flags' lifetime. I hesitated with just doing a copy, but it's not too bad as is.
bnjbvr requested cfallin for a review on PR #1530.
bjorn3 submitted PR Review.
bjorn3 created PR Review Comment:
// X22 - X28
cfallin submitted PR Review.
cfallin submitted PR Review.
cfallin created PR Review Comment:
Doc comment now that this is
pub
?
cfallin created PR Review Comment:
I understand the optimization here but this
Writable
cast makes me a little nervous; perhaps it would be better to take aWritable<Reg>
forfrom_reg
to enable this? Then the safety argument is a completely local property of the machine-independent lowering code that calls us: it knows that it's generating the copy into the retval just before the epilogue, and so can break its usual "SSA value's register is only writable at SSA def point" invariant (or if it does something different, allocate a writable temp to use here).
cfallin created PR Review Comment:
Can we just create an
Inst::Move
and theninst.emit(sink);
as we do for the other pseudoinstructions?
cfallin created PR Review Comment:
I'm not super-excited about the
'flags
lifetime carried into theVCode
; it will propagate to anything else that contains aVCode
which is not very ergonomic. (On preview of the rest of the patch below, it already led to a lot of boilerplate churn.) Reading the generated code, it looks like it's currently a[u8; 7]
(so the pointer is larger than the flags array itself!). In general, with a bit per flag, I wouldn't expect it to grow beyond a few words, for a while anyway. Could we just clone it instead?
bnjbvr submitted PR Review.
bnjbvr created PR Review Comment:
Oh yes, it's much simpler.
bnjbvr updated PR #1530 from bbouvier-arm64-fixes
to master
:
This rebases and adapts patches that landed in our arm64 work-in-progress branch after the last commit that was merged with the new arm64 backend.
Commit 8f181f8 is a bit invasive, because it propagates the
settings::Flags
down to the arm64 machinery, and the ABI has to be marked with the Flags' lifetime. I hesitated with just doing a copy, but it's not too bad as is.
bnjbvr requested cfallin for a review on PR #1530.
bnjbvr updated PR #1530 from bbouvier-arm64-fixes
to master
:
This rebases and adapts patches that landed in our arm64 work-in-progress branch after the last commit that was merged with the new arm64 backend.
Commit 8f181f8 is a bit invasive, because it propagates the
settings::Flags
down to the arm64 machinery, and the ABI has to be marked with the Flags' lifetime. I hesitated with just doing a copy, but it's not too bad as is.
bjorn3 created PR Review Comment:
Should this be updated?
bjorn3 submitted PR Review.
bjorn3 edited PR Review Comment.
cfallin submitted PR Review.
cfallin merged PR #1530.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC