Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #14586 Re-enqueue low priority items instea...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 06 2026 at 20:23):

alexcrichton opened PR #14586 from alexcrichton:requeue-work to bytecodealliance:main:

When a run_concurrent future is dropped we'll properly clean up all resources associated with it, however Wasmtime will end up losing work if the store is resumed later and wasn't otherwise executing any wasm. This replaces the preexisting Drop-guard with one that re-enqueues the low-priority work into the store upon cancellation.

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please review the Bytecode Alliance's AI tool usage policy at
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/governance/blob/main/AI_TOOL_POLICY.md

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 06 2026 at 20:23):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #14586.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 06 2026 at 20:23):

alexcrichton requested cfallin for a review on PR #14586.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 06 2026 at 21:46):

github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:api on PR #14586.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 08 2026 at 16:49):

fitzgen unassigned cfallin from PR #14586 Re-enqueue low priority items instead of dropping them.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Oct 08 2026 at 16:49):

fitzgen requested dicej for a review on PR #14586.


Last updated: Oct 11 2026 at 04:10 UTC