6d6f6d656e746f opened PR #13737 from 6d6f6d656e746f:feature/compilerless-deserialize-test-and-docs-fixes to bytecodealliance:main:
This PR adds a unit test verifying that JIT/AOT precompiled WebAssembly modules can be successfully deserialized, instantiated, and executed in an Engine configured without a compiler (enable_compiler(false)).
As recommended by the contribution guidelines regarding trivial changes, I have also bundled a few separate commits to clean up documentation and fix links:
- Fixes a typo in cli-options.md where --invoke was written as - invoke.
- Replaces legacy links to bytecodealliance.github.io/wasmtime/api/ with docs.rs/wasmtime.
- Defines the missing Config::profiler markdown link reference at the bottom of examples-profiling-perf.md.
- Removes the empty orphan file docs/examples-rust-wasip2.md.
6d6f6d656e746f requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #13737.
6d6f6d656e746f requested pchickey for a review on PR #13737.
6d6f6d656e746f requested fitzgen for a review on PR #13737.
6d6f6d656e746f requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #13737.
6d6f6d656e746f updated PR #13737.
github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:docs on PR #13737.
:cross_mark: pchickey closed without merge PR #13737.
pchickey commented on PR #13737:
I don't feel this meets the bar for a nontrivial contribution. If you want to engage with this community and become a contributor to the project, please speak to us in Zulip as a human, but the functionality this tests is so trivial and core to the purpose of those features that I'm confident that its already covered.
The purpose of our policy is that maintainers like me don't have to spend our limited time and energy on PRs from drive-by extractive engagements. If you can demonstrate you are actually using this software and engaging with our community in an additive way, please do so on our Zulip and only make more PRs if asked to there. Right now this has all the smell of an LLM driven engagement farming an account with very little history, and I don't want to spend more of my time and energy on it.
pchickey edited a comment on PR #13737:
I don't feel this meets the bar for a nontrivial contribution. If you want to engage with this community and become a contributor to the project, please speak to us in Zulip as a human, but the functionality this tests is so trivial and core to the purpose of those features that I'm confident that its already covered.
The purpose of our policy is that maintainers like me don't have to spend our limited time and energy on PRs from drive-by extractive engagements. If you can demonstrate you are actually using this software and engaging with our community in an additive way, please do so on our Zulip and only make more PRs if asked to there. Right now this has all the smell of an LLM driven engagement farming from an account with very little history, and I don't want to spend more of my time and energy on it.
Last updated: Jul 29 2026 at 05:03 UTC