Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #13680 Route current-thread reads through `...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:01):

fitzgen opened PR #13680 from fitzgen:funnel-current-thread-through-store-opaque to bytecodealliance:main:

This commit introduces a force_current_thread method (currently a stub) to funnel thread access through ahead of the deferred-thread fast path for fused sync-to-sync adapters.

This commit has no behavior changes.

Part of https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/12311

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:01):

fitzgen requested pchickey for a review on PR #13680.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:01):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #13680.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:16):

alexcrichton unassigned pchickey from PR #13680 Route current-thread reads through StoreOpaque::{current_thread,force_current_thread}.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:16):

alexcrichton requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #13680.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:16):

alexcrichton commented on PR #13680:

Would you be ok holding off landing an incremental step like this until more infrastructure is implemented? I'd prefer to not be in a too-half-transitioned state and this is fine IMO to lump together with other changes, especially as a separate commit. (otherwise lgtm though)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:18):

fitzgen commented on PR #13680:

Yeah, sure I can roll this up into other PRs (as a separate commit)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 17 2026 at 20:18):

:cross_mark: fitzgen closed without merge PR #13680.


Last updated: Jul 29 2026 at 05:03 UTC