alexcrichton opened PR #13361 from alexcrichton:implements to bytecodealliance:main:
This commit plumbs the type system support for
(implement "...")in
the component model throughout Wasmtime. Notably the fields and such are
all faithfully carried over from wasmparser into the type reflection
within Wasmtime itself. This'll be needed for loading components with
this field. Note that no bindings generation is not updated yet, this is
only the compiler/runtime side of(implement "...")and bindings
generation will be a subsequent update.
alexcrichton commented on PR #13361:
Note that this is currently built on https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/13360
alexcrichton updated PR #13361.
github-actions[bot] added the label fuzzing on PR #13361.
github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:config on PR #13361.
github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:api on PR #13361.
github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:c-api on PR #13361.
github-actions[bot] added the label wizer on PR #13361.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13361:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:c-api", "wasmtime:config", "wizer"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing, wizer
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13361:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstructs).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
alexcrichton updated PR #13361.
alexcrichton has marked PR #13361 as ready for review.
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #13361.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #13361.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #13361.
:thumbs_up: fitzgen submitted PR review.
:speech_balloon: fitzgen created PR review comment:
TODO
:speech_balloon: fitzgen created PR review comment:
TODO
alexcrichton updated PR #13361.
alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #13361.
alexcrichton added PR #13361 Plumb (implements "...") support throughout to the merge queue.
:check: alexcrichton merged PR #13361.
alexcrichton removed PR #13361 Plumb (implements "...") support throughout from the merge queue.
Last updated: Jun 01 2026 at 09:49 UTC