Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #13359 add watchOS CI build target


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 13 2026 at 21:37):

matthargett opened PR #13359 from rebeckerspecialties:claude/add-watchos-ci-target-lSsZ6 to bytecodealliance:main:

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
With the watchOS ILP32 (arm64_32) fixes all merged (tracking issue #13255 ), add the watchOS interpreter-only build to the CI matrix to (hopefully) catch regressions during normal maintenance. if it turns out now to be enough of a safety net, we can add a basic simulator smoke test depeneding on the failure modes.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 13 2026 at 21:37):

matthargett requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #13359.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 13 2026 at 21:37):

matthargett requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #13359.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 13 2026 at 22:51):

:memo: alexcrichton submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 13 2026 at 22:51):

:speech_balloon: alexcrichton created PR review comment:

Ideally this would use -p wasmtime, and is the only blocker for that publishing a new target-lexicon?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 13 2026 at 22:51):

:speech_balloon: alexcrichton created PR review comment:

This one I think might actually be reasonable to leave off because cranelift-codegen doesn't have much platform-specific in it. Basically the preexisting no_std check probably covers the bits for cranelift-codegen well

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 14 2026 at 07:03):

:memo: matthargett submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 14 2026 at 07:03):

:speech_balloon: matthargett created PR review comment:

I think so. --no-default-features sidesteps needing the mach2 update.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 14 2026 at 07:05):

matthargett updated PR #13359.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 14 2026 at 14:50):

:memo: alexcrichton submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 14 2026 at 14:50):

:speech_balloon: alexcrichton created PR review comment:

Ok, in that case I think it's best to get target-lexicon published first to add the check for wasmtime here. Otherwise I suspect this probably already passed prior to your work and the real interesting portabilty target is Wasmtime itself, so the check as-is isn't buying a whole lot

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 22 2026 at 04:11):

:cross_mark: matthargett closed without merge PR #13359.


Last updated: Jun 01 2026 at 09:49 UTC