Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 08 2026 at 22:34): Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 08 2026 at 22:34):alexcrichton opened PR #13331 from alexcrichton:limit-call-async to bytecodealliance:main:
Otherwise a huge number of slow exports could get invoked which would easily time out.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 08 2026 at 22:34):alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #13331.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 08 2026 at 22:34):alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #13331.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 08 2026 at 22:34):alexcrichton commented on PR #13331:
This is intended to fix https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase-detail/6674028684443648
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 09 2026 at 02:34):github-actions[bot] added the label fuzzing on PR #13331.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 09 2026 at 02:34):github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13331:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @fitzgen
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- fitzgen: fuzzing
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 12 2026 at 18:39)::thumbs_up: fitzgen submitted PR review:
Seems fine, but even better would be to apply a global timeout and allow any number of functions within that limit rather than a per-function limit?
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 12 2026 at 20:05):alexcrichton commented on PR #13331:
I'm wary of throwing too much timing in here insofar as it runs the risk of making fuzzing nondeterministic between OSS-Fuzz and locall and such. I'm going to go ahead and merge this to fix the open oss-fuzz bug, but we can of course continue to refine.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 12 2026 at 20:05):alexcrichton added PR #13331 Limit functions executed in call_async fuzzer to the merge queue.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 12 2026 at 20:30)::check: alexcrichton merged PR #13331.
Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 12 2026 at 20:30):alexcrichton removed PR #13331 Limit functions executed in call_async fuzzer from the merge queue.
Last updated: Jun 01 2026 at 09:49 UTC