Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #13289 Add a `.wast` test to better exercis...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2026 at 20:49):

fitzgen opened PR #13289 from fitzgen:ref-eq-wast-test to bytecodealliance:main:

Was not covered very well by our existing tests.

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2026 at 20:49):

fitzgen requested cfallin for a review on PR #13289.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2026 at 20:49):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #13289.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2026 at 20:52):

:thumbs_up: alexcrichton submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2026 at 20:52):

alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #13289.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 05 2026 at 21:03):

alexcrichton added PR #13289 Add a .wast test to better exercise the ref.eq instruction to the merge queue.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 06 2026 at 00:22):

:check: alexcrichton merged PR #13289.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (May 06 2026 at 00:22):

alexcrichton removed PR #13289 Add a .wast test to better exercise the ref.eq instruction from the merge queue.


Last updated: Jun 01 2026 at 09:49 UTC