darioush opened PR #13271 from darioush:winch-aarch64-wide-arithmetic to bytecodealliance:main:
Replace the unimplemented stubs for
add128,sub128, andmul_wideon aarch64 with real implementations using ADDS+ADC, SUBS+SBC, and MUL+UMULH/SMULH respectively, and drop the gate that forced the wide-arithmetic feature off when targeting Winch on aarch64.For
mul_widethe high-half multiply is emitted before the low-half multiply because the low-half destination aliases an input register.Issue: #11929
darioush edited PR #13271:
Replace the unimplemented stubs for
add128,sub128, andmul_wideon aarch64 with implementations using ADDS+ADC, SUBS+SBC, and MUL+UMULH/SMULH respectively, and drop the gate that forced the wide-arithmetic feature off when targeting Winch on aarch64.For
mul_widethe high-half multiply is emitted before the low-half multiply because the low-half destination aliases an input register.Issue: #11929
darioush has marked PR #13271 as ready for review.
darioush requested Copilot for a review on PR #13271.
darioush requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #13271.
darioush requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #13271.
darioush requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #13271.
github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:config on PR #13271.
github-actions[bot] added the label wasmtime:api on PR #13271.
github-actions[bot] added the label winch on PR #13271.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13271:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @saulecabrera
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:config", "winch"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- saulecabrera: winch
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13271:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstructs).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
:memo: saulecabrera submitted PR review:
Could you add some disassembly tests as well?
darioush updated PR #13271.
darioush updated PR #13271.
alexcrichton unassigned alexcrichton from PR #13271 winch/aarch64: implement the wide-arithmetic proposal.
alexcrichton requested saulecabrera for a review on PR #13271.
:thumbs_up: saulecabrera submitted PR review:
This looks reasonable to me, left one comment which I think is worth addressing before merging. Thanks!
:speech_balloon: saulecabrera created PR review comment:
Could we avoid introducing this method here and instead refactor the existing
subs_rrrimplementation to take a destination register? For call sites that want to discard the destination register e.g.,cmp, we could passwritable!(regs::zero())
darioush updated PR #13271.
darioush updated PR #13271.
:memo: darioush submitted PR review.
:speech_balloon: darioush created PR review comment:
Thanks for the quick reviews, really appreciate your time and consideration. Done in ad376da
saulecabrera added PR #13271 winch/aarch64: implement the wide-arithmetic proposal to the merge queue.
:check: saulecabrera merged PR #13271.
saulecabrera removed PR #13271 winch/aarch64: implement the wide-arithmetic proposal from the merge queue.
Last updated: Jun 01 2026 at 09:49 UTC