Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #13090 Add OOM test for `Component::compone...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 15:48):

fitzgen opened PR #13090 from fitzgen:oom-test-for-component-component-type to bytecodealliance:main:

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 15:48):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #13090.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 15:48):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #13090.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 15:48):

fitzgen requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #13090.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 16:15):

alexcrichton submitted PR review:

Personally this feels overkill for this method, so I've posted https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/13091 which I think will remove the need for this. Does that sound ok to you?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 16:26):

fitzgen closed without merge PR #13090.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Apr 14 2026 at 16:26):

fitzgen commented on PR #13090:

Personally this feels overkill for this method, so I've posted #13091 which I think will remove the need for this. Does that sound ok to you?

Sounds good to me!


Last updated: May 03 2026 at 22:13 UTC