Tam1SH opened PR #12073 from Tam1SH:main to bytecodealliance:main:
Spent an hour figuring out that the documentation was missing this crucial detail :)
Tam1SH requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #12073.
Tam1SH requested dicej for a review on PR #12073.
dicej submitted PR review:
Thanks for this! LGTM, but please see the inline comment.
dicej created PR review comment:
/// When defining functions that belong to a specific (sub)component instanceI'd suggest saying "component" rather than "module" here, since neither
LinkernorLinkerInstancegive you direct access to the modules inside components.
alexcrichton created PR review comment:
The example here is for core wasm, not components, so this'll need to stay as it was before. You can add (or link) a different example for components though
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
Tam1SH submitted PR review.
Tam1SH created PR review comment:
Got it, thanks
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC