sunfishcode opened PR #11947 from sunfishcode:sunfishcode/names to bytecodealliance:main:
In the
wasmtime::component::generatemacro, change the syntax for referencing functions and types inside interfaces to use.instead of/.For example, this changes strings like
wasi:http/types/outgoing-body
to
wasi:http/types.outgoing-body
.This makes the syntax more consistent with the syntax of [WIT
usestatements], which use.for this purpose.And, it avoids an incompatibility with the future nested namespaces syntax ([:nest_with_eggs:]), where the
/dina:b/c/dis for traversing a component export rather than an interface member.[WIT
usestatements]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/design/mvp/WIT.md#wit-packages-and-use
[:nest_with_eggs:]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/design/mvp/Explainer.md#gated-features<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
sunfishcode requested wasmtime-wasi-reviewers for a review on PR #11947.
sunfishcode requested pchickey for a review on PR #11947.
sunfishcode requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #11947.
pchickey submitted PR review.
sunfishcode updated PR #11947.
sunfishcode updated PR #11947.
sunfishcode updated PR #11947.
sunfishcode updated PR #11947.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #11947:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstructs).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
alexcrichton merged PR #11947.
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC