iximeow submitted PR Review.
iximeow submitted PR Review.
iximeow created PR Review Comment:
I am a little :crying_cat_face: that the manual (at least the latest one I see online: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-64-and-ia-32-architectures-sdm-combined-volumes-1-2a-2b-2c-2d-3a-3b-3c-3d-and-4 from October 2019) doesn't seem to say anything about these bits being inverted in EVEX prefixes. In fact, just reading the manual suggests the opposite:
Combine with ModR/M.reg, ModR/M.rm (base, index/vidx)
, fromTable 2-30. EVEX Prefix Bit Field Functional Grouping
.Anyway, I see the negated interpretation is backed up by XED so :+1:
iximeow created PR Review Comment:
It's a bit defensive, but do you think a
debug_assert!(enc.mm() < 0b100)
makes sense here?VEX.mmmmm > 0b10
is also an error at the moment, and I suspect we'd need to look at encoding rules again if that changed too. So the most likely case I imagine forenc.mm() > 0b11
is "Cranelift error". I also see thatmm()
returns the bits masked by0x3
anyway, so if this is in use when higher values become allocated (and we want to use them) there might need to be other places that need fixing as well.
iximeow created PR Review Comment:
/// used together for certain classes of instructions; i.e., special care should be taken to ensureI think this is the missing word, anyway?
abrown submitted PR Review.
abrown created PR Review Comment:
Yeah, me too... mostly because I implemented it without inversion first and then had to invert it after getting weird results. I will ask around here to see if anyone knows what team is responsible for editing the manual.
abrown updated PR #1192 from evex
to master
:
abrown updated PR #1192 from evex
to master
:
abrown updated PR #1192 from evex
to master
:
abrown submitted PR Review.
abrown created PR Review Comment:
I added it.
abrown submitted PR Review.
abrown created PR Review Comment:
Added this in a fixup and rebased so that the history looks cleaner; like we discussed, I think there are some bug fixes here that we won't want to squash together so I have been carefully rebasing.
abrown submitted PR Review.
abrown created PR Review Comment:
Ok, I e-mailed someone internally about this. Let's see what happens.
iximeow submitted PR Review.
yurydelendik submitted PR Review.
yurydelendik submitted PR Review.
abrown merged PR #1192.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 16:03 UTC