alexcrichton opened PR #11788 from alexcrichton:document-wasefire-minimal-embedding to bytecodealliance:main:
I confirmed [here] it was ok to do so but the minimal-embedding documentation seems as reasonable a place as any to document this and showcase one of the smaller embeddings we know of for Wasmtime.
[here]: https://github.com/google/wasefire/issues/458#issuecomment-3275263801
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #11788.
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #11788.
pchickey commented on PR #11788:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/ADOPTERS.md as well?
pchickey submitted PR review.
alexcrichton commented on PR #11788:
I'm hesitant to sign someone else up for that (I'm not a contact myself), so I'll defer that for a future PR
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/ADOPTERS.md as well?
Good question. From what I can tell, this only applies to usage in production. Wasefire is still experimental and so far only used in isolated internal projects which I wouldn't call production. But good to know that this is something to update in case it becomes the case.
alexcrichton merged PR #11788.
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC