fitzgen opened PR #11462 from fitzgen:already-did-inlining to bytecodealliance:main:
Due to our bottom-up, SCC-based approach to inlining, we've already performed inlining on the callee, and do not need to consider any further inlining within it.
This also prevents us from inlining recursive callees all the way up to the size threshold, and instead just inline one layer.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
fitzgen requested cfallin for a review on PR #11462.
fitzgen requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #11462.
fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #11462.
fitzgen requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #11462.
fitzgen updated PR #11462.
alexcrichton submitted PR review.
fitzgen merged PR #11462.
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC