Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #11462 Do not consider inlined function bod...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 19:59):

fitzgen opened PR #11462 from fitzgen:already-did-inlining to bytecodealliance:main:

Due to our bottom-up, SCC-based approach to inlining, we've already performed inlining on the callee, and do not need to consider any further inlining within it.

This also prevents us from inlining recursive callees all the way up to the size threshold, and instead just inline one layer.

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 19:59):

fitzgen requested cfallin for a review on PR #11462.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 19:59):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #11462.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 19:59):

fitzgen requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #11462.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 19:59):

fitzgen requested alexcrichton for a review on PR #11462.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 20:15):

fitzgen updated PR #11462.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 20:55):

alexcrichton submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Aug 19 2025 at 21:24):

fitzgen merged PR #11462.


Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC