alexcrichton opened PR #10985 from alexcrichton:redundant_field_names to bytecodealliance:main:
Seems like a clear enough improvement and also something useful to have a lint for as refactorings enable/disable this pattern over time, so this should help us stay consistent.
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton requested cfallin for a review on PR #10985.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #10985.
alexcrichton requested pchickey for a review on PR #10985.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #10985.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #10985.
pchickey submitted PR review.
pchickey merged PR #10985.
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC