Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #10938 [34.0.0] Revert "Stack switching: In...

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 21:54):

alexcrichton opened PR #10938 from alexcrichton:backport to bytecodealliance:release-34.0.0:

This is a revert of #10388 for the 34.0.0 release branch. That commit was the last commit in on the release branch and there should be no harm in deferring it for one extra release (stack-switching is still a work-in-progress on main) and the hope is that this reduces the risk/need to backport any changes.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 21:54):

alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #10938.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 21:54):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-fuzz-reviewers for a review on PR #10938.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 21:54):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #10938.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 21:54):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #10938.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 21:54):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #10938.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 22:17):

fitzgen submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 22:22):

alexcrichton merged PR #10938.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 05 2025 at 22:23):

alexcrichton commented on PR #10938:

cc @posborne sorry I should have cc'd you on this to start. I'm not dead-set on doing this I just figured it'd be a reasonable idea. If you would prefer to get this infrastructure landed on the release branch though I think it'd be reasonable to re-land. (and to clarify I have no intention of reverting on main, this was just to de-risk the release branch a little)

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Jun 06 2025 at 15:21):

posborne commented on PR #10938:

cc @posborne sorry I should have cc'd you on this to start. I'm not dead-set on doing this I just figured it'd be a reasonable idea. If you would prefer to get this infrastructure landed on the release branch though I think it'd be reasonable to re-land. (and to clarify I have no intention of reverting on main, this was just to de-risk the release branch a little)

No, I'm happy with this not being included on the release branch for this cycle.

Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC