alexcrichton opened PR #10738 from alexcrichton:run-aarch64-wich-tests to bytecodealliance:main:
Most tests pass (yay!), some tests fail, and some tests crash and/or have nondeterministic results. A new
WastTest::should_skip_entirelyhelper is added to avoid running crashing or nondeterministic tests in CI and that should enable all other tests to run in CI to ensure we have a ratchet to prevent future regressions. This should also in theory make testing easier locally withcargo test --test wast.Closes #9566
<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:
If this work has been discussed elsewhere, please include a link to that
conversation. If it was discussed in an issue, just mention "issue #...".Explain why this change is needed. If the details are in an issue already,
this can be brief.Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.htmlPlease ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->
alexcrichton requested abrown for a review on PR #10738.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-compiler-reviewers for a review on PR #10738.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #10738.
alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #10738.
alexcrichton requested fitzgen for a review on PR #10738.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #10738:
Subscribe to Label Action
cc @saulecabrera
<details>
This issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:config", "wasmtime:docs", "winch"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
- saulecabrera: winch
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the <code>.github/subscribe-to-label.json</code> configuration file.
Learn more.
</details>
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #10738:
Label Messager: wasmtime:config
It looks like you are changing Wasmtime's configuration options. Make sure to
complete this check list:
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, you wrote extensive documentation for
it.<details>
Our documentation should be of the following form:
```text
Short, simple summary sentence.More details. These details can be multiple paragraphs. There should be
information about not just the method, but its parameters and results as
well.Is this method fallible? If so, when can it return an error?
Can this method panic? If so, when does it panic?
Example
Optional example here.
```</details>
[ ] If you added a new
Configmethod, or modified an existing one, you
ensured that this configuration is exercised by the fuzz targets.<details>
For example, if you expose a new strategy for allocating the next instance
slot inside the pooling allocator, you should ensure that at least one of our
fuzz targets exercises that new strategy.Often, all that is required of you is to ensure that there is a knob for this
configuration option in [wasmtime_fuzzing::Config][fuzzing-config] (or one
of its nestedstructs).Rarely, this may require authoring a new fuzz target to specifically test this
configuration. See [our docs on fuzzing][fuzzing-docs] for more details.</details>
[ ] If you are enabling a configuration option by default, make sure that it
has been fuzzed for at least two weeks before turning it on by default.[fuzzing-config]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/ca0e8d0a1d8cefc0496dba2f77a670571d8fdcab/crates/fuzzing/src/generators.rs#L182-L194
[fuzzing-docs]: https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-fuzzing.html
<details>
To modify this label's message, edit the <code>.github/label-messager/wasmtime-config.md</code> file.
To add new label messages or remove existing label messages, edit the
<code>.github/label-messager.json</code> configuration file.</details>
alexcrichton closed without merge PR #10738.
alexcrichton commented on PR #10738:
After some follow-up discussion I think it's a bit premature for this so I'm going to close this.
saulecabrera commented on PR #10738:
I opened https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/10750, with some inspiration from this pull request and after our discussion in our meeting today. Let me know what you think!
Last updated: Dec 06 2025 at 06:05 UTC