Stream: git-wasmtime

Topic: wasmtime / PR #10314 Update wasm-tools to the latest revi...


view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2025 at 22:41):

alexcrichton opened PR #10314 from alexcrichton:update-wasm-tools to bytecodealliance:main:

<!--
Please make sure you include the following information:

Our development process is documented in the Wasmtime book:
https://docs.wasmtime.dev/contributing-development-process.html

Please ensure all communication follows the code of conduct:
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
-->

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Feb 28 2025 at 22:41):

alexcrichton commented on PR #10314:

Draft for now as they're git dependencies

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 15:35):

alexcrichton updated PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:07):

alexcrichton updated PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:07):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-core-reviewers for a review on PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:07):

alexcrichton requested pchickey for a review on PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:07):

alexcrichton requested wasmtime-default-reviewers for a review on PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:07):

alexcrichton has marked PR #10314 as ready for review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:10):

alexcrichton commented on PR #10314:

Ok this is now ready for review. It's going to have a lot of conflicts with https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/10106, however, so the plan is to land that first currently.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 16:51):

pchickey submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:00):

alexcrichton updated PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:01):

alexcrichton commented on PR #10314:

@dicej mind doing a once-over on this with an eye towards the component-model-async bits?

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:05):

alexcrichton updated PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:14):

dicej submitted PR review:

Thanks for doing this!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:14):

dicej created PR review comment:

Any concerns about the cost of doing these format!s unconditionally despite only using the result if there's an error? If so, perhaps we could make this a lambda that we call from within the with_context closure.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:15):

alexcrichton submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:15):

alexcrichton created PR review comment:

Nah they were gonna all happen anyway, I just moved them a bit earlier so cranelift failures now have the function name so I don't have to go hunting down which intrinsic is the one that needs updating

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:15):

dicej submitted PR review.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:15):

dicej created PR review comment:

Oops, nevermind, I didn't notice we use it in the non-error case. Disregard!

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:18):

alexcrichton updated PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:18):

alexcrichton has enabled auto merge for PR #10314.

view this post on Zulip Wasmtime GitHub notifications bot (Mar 05 2025 at 22:52):

alexcrichton merged PR #10314.


Last updated: Dec 13 2025 at 19:03 UTC